The mixing ratio measured by the Aero-Laser model AL-5002 CO analyzer. See also CORAW_AL above. The calculation of COMR_AL is based on in-flight calibrations conducted 1-2 times per hour, when a gas of known concentration is supplied to the instrument and then a catalyst trap removes CO to provide a zero reference. The calibration results in a sensitivity and zero that are then used to convert the measurements from the instrument (recorded as counts per second) to a mixing ratio in units of ppbv. Time-dependent sensitivity and zero coefficients are computed post-flight as a linear interpolation between flight calibrations. This variable normally appears in final data sets for a project.44
The algorithm is described in the following box:
CPS = counts per second from the instrument
S(t) = sensitivity
at time t
= (CPS when exposed to cal gas) / concentration of cal gas
Z(t) = zero at time t
= CPS when exposed to air passing through the catalyst trap
\[\begin{equation} \mathrm{\{COMR\_AL\}} = (\mathrm{\{CPS\}}-Z(t))/S(t) \tag{6.1} \end{equation}\]
See also the obsolete variables in Section 10, where variables from an earlier TECO Model 48 CO analyzer, in use before 2000, are described.Respectively, the carbon dioxide and methane mixing ratio measured by a Picarro CO2/CH4 instrument. The letter ’x’ may be replaced by the model number of the instrument (e.g., 1301) or it may be blank. The Picarro CO2/CH4 G1301-f flight analyzer is a fast response trace gas monitor that measures CO2 and CH4 using wavelength-scanned cavity ring-down spectroscopy. The time resolution is 0.2 – 1 seconds. Additional information characterizing the instrument can be found at this URL. During flight, both measurements are calibrated 1-2 times per hour via sampling of a working standard, and linear calibration coefficients are applied based on multi-point lab calibration data and in-flight calibration checks. The procedure is analogous to that used for COMR_AL, as described immediately above. When water vapor is not removed from the ambient sample stream (the normal case), a correction factor for water present in the sensing cell must be applied following the approach of Richardson et al.,45
as follows:
[CO\(_{2}\)]\(_{wet}\) = carbon dioxide mixing ratio as measured
in the sensing cell (with water)
[CO\(_{2}\)]\(_{dry}\) = carbon dioxide mixing ratio in dry air,
corrected for the effects of water vapor
[CH\(_{4}\)]\(_{wet}\) = methane mixing ratio as measured in the
sensing cell (with water)
[CH\(_{4}\)]\(_{dry}\) = methane mixing ratio in dry air, corrected
for the effects of water vapor
\(W\) = water vapor mixing ratio measured in the instrument cell [percent
by volume]
{\(c_{0}\), \(c_{1}\)} = {\(-0.01200,\,-2.674\times10^{-4}\)} [dimensionless]
{\(d_{0}\), \(d_{1}\)} = {\(-0.00982,\ -2.393\times10^{-4}\)} [dimensionless]
\[\begin{equation} \{\mathrm{CO2\_PICX\}}=[\mathrm{CO_{2}]_{dry}=}\frac{[\mathrm{CO_{2}]_{wet}}}{1+c_{0}W+c_{1}W^{2}} \tag{6.2} \end{equation}\] \[\begin{equation} \{\mathrm{CH4\_PICX\}}=[\mathrm{CH_{4}]_{dry}=}\frac{[\mathrm{CH_{4}]_{wet}}}{1+d_{0}W+d_{1}W^{2}} \tag{6.3} \end{equation}\]
Sample pressure in the chemiluminescence ozone sensor. This variable was associated with measurements made by an earlier version of the fast ozone instrument. It has not been present in projects since 2006.
The ozone mixing ratio (by volume) measured by an NO chemiluminescence instrument. The instrument detects chemiluminescence from the reaction of nitric oxide (NO) with ambient ozone, using a dry-ice cooled, red-sensitive photomultiplier employing photon-counting electronics. The measurement principle is described by Ridley et al. (1992),46
and there is additional information describing the instrument at this URL. The time resolution is 0.2 seconds, and typical uncertainty is 5%. The background signal is measured 1-2 times hourly during flights. Linear calibration coefficients are applied to the photon count rate to produce mixing ratios, and a correction is applied for water vapor during final processing, as follows:
CPS = counts per second from the instrument
[O\(_{3}\)]\(_{wet}\) = ozone mixing ratio as measured in the sensing
cell (with water)
[O\(_{3}\)]\(_{dry}\) = ozone mixing ratio in dry air, corrected
for the effects of water vapor
\(S(t)\) = sensitivity at time t = (CPS when exposed to cal gas)
/ concentration of cal gas
\(Z(t)\) = background at time t = CPS when exposed to zero-ozone
air
\(r_v\) = water vapor mixing ratio by volume
[expressed as a fraction; dimensionless]
\(\kappa\) = correction factor for water vapor = 4.3 [dimensionless]
\[\begin{equation} [\mathrm{O}_{3}]_{wet}=\frac{\mathrm{\{CPS\}}-Z(t)}{S(t)} \tag{6.4} \end{equation}\] \[\begin{equation} \mathrm{\{F03\_ACD\}}=[\mathrm{O_{3}}]_{dry} = \mathrm{[O_{3}]_{wet}}\times(1+\kappa r_{v}) \tag{6.5} \end{equation}\]
The pressure inside the detection cell of the TECO 49 UV ozone analyzer. This and the following temperature are used to convert the measurements from the instrument to units of ppbv.
The temperature inside the detection cell of the TECO 49 UV ozone analyzer. This and the preceding pressure are used to convert the measurements from the instrument to units of ppbv. In many projects, the cell temperature was not recorded so an expected cell temperature in the aircraft cabin must be used in processing.
The measurements provided by the NO+NO2 instrument, which is described at this link. XNO and XNOY are the raw data counts from the NO and NO2 instruments, respectively, and XNCLF and XNOCF are the respective calibration flows for these instruments. XNST records the status for both instruments: In measurement mode, XNST is 0, while XNST is 5 when the instruments are in zero mode and 10 when the instruments are in calibration mode. the NOy and NO instruments. The instrument is in the measure mode for XNST of 0. For a XNST reading of 5 the instruments are in the zero mode. XNST value of 10 is the calibration mode. XNOZA and XNZAF are flow rates for zero air used to back flush inlets, typically at takeoff and landing, and for calibration using “zero” air. Even if the status, XNST, is 0, indicating the instrument is in the measurement mode, when XNOZA and XNZAF are approximately 1 SLPM the instrument is measuring zero air and not ambient air. XNOSF and XNSAF are the sample flow rates through the NO and NO2 instruments respectively. These values are typically about 1 SLPM. XNMBT is the temperature of the gold NO2 converter.
The calibrated NO and NO2 volumetric mixing ratio, respectively, measured by the NO-NO2 instrument. See this link for a description of the instrument. The NO and NO2 data are represented by a cubic spline for baseline subtraction, and then the calibration coefficients are applied and the measurements are converted to units of ppbv. The quality of the data can be assessed by examining the accuracy of the zero correction. This instrument adds water vapor to the sample stream to reduce the effect of ambient water on the final signal. The water vapor addition is not sufficient to saturate the sample stream, but enough to remove much of the interference. The detection limits of the NO, NO2 instruments are 50 ppbv for a one-second averaging time. The uncertainty is ± 5%.
Research projects often incorporate user-supplied instruments into payloads, and those instruments produce data files that are either recorded independently or merged into the standard netCDF data files for the projects. In addition, NCAR offers a set of instruments that require additional data processing and analysis, often because the measurements require special interpretation to obtain the desired measurements. The following instruments can provide such air-chemistry measurements:
Advanced Whole Air Sampler AWAS
Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer CIMS
Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer QCLS
Trace Organic Gas Analyzer TOGA
Users interested in using these measurements should contact EOL/RAF data management for data access and assistance.
Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 104, No. D1, 1699-1704, 1999.↩︎
In isolated cases XCOMR or XCOMR_AL was used for this variable name.↩︎
Richardson, S. J., N. L. Miles, K. J. Davis, E. R. Crosson, C. W. Rella, and A. E. Andrews, 2012: Field testing of cavity ring-down spectroscopy analyzers measuring carbon dioxide and water vapor. J. Atmos. Oceanic_Technol, 29, 397–406.↩︎
Ridley, B. A., F. E. Grahek, and J. G. Walega, 1992: A small, high-sensitivity, medium-response ozone detector suitable for measurements from light aircraft. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 9, 142–148.↩︎