Hydrologic Modeling

Improving Hydrologic Modeling for Climate Impact Assessments

The challenge:

Management decisions about our nation’s water resources are made against a backdrop of uncertainty. Uncertainty about water supply and demand affects both short-range operational decisions and long-range planning. Risk-based operations and planning methods require realistic descriptions of uncertainty, yet an important source of uncertainty that has so far been neglected in climate impact assessments originates with hydrologic models. Hydrologic models can produce a wide range of predictions for the same events, even when forced with identical meteorology.

Facing this challenge:

Scientists and engineers in RAL’s Hydrometeorological Applications Program at the National Center for Atmospheric Research are collaborating with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the University of Washington to develop a unified hydrologic modeling approach, SUMMA (the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives), that is built on a common set of governing equations and a common numerical solver. The SUMMA framework can be used to systematically characterize hydrologic model uncertainty through exploring modeling decisions with controlled manipulations of model configurations and parameters. The resulting, large ensembles reveal the underlying model uncertainty and thus improve the probabilistic characterization of risk. By using a common modeling core, the overhead associated with the creation of large model ensembles is significantly reduced, which is a major departure from current “small ensemble” methods. SUMMA source code and test cases are freely available at https://www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/summa.

Scientific advances:

  • Process flexibility. SUMMA explicitly simulates dominant biophysical and hydrologic processes, from treetops to bedrock, and from the ridgetop to the stream, providing multiple options for how individual processes are simulated. SUMMA also allows for extensive flexibility to experiment with different model parameter values.

  • Spatial flexibility. SUMMA includes capabilities to easily experiment with different representations of spatial variability and hydrologic connectivity, including different spatial resolutions, different spatial configurations (e.g., grids and hydrologic response units), and different representations of how water moves laterally.

  • Numerical flexibility. To generalize approaches from multiple models, SUMMA separates the representation of physical processes from the numerical solution. This simplifies incorporating different modeling approaches, and, importantly, enables experimenting with different numerical solvers.

Moving Forward:

  • Current work is focused on increasing the technical readiness level of SUMMA, to support large-ensemble continental-domain model applications.

  • SUMMA is being rigorously tested in research watersheds, and will be enhanced to enable accurate model simulations of dominant hydrologic processes in different environments, including glaciers and permafrost in Alaska and volcanic geology, intense rainfall, and high rates of evapotranspiration in Hawaii.

  • SUMMA will provide the foundation for future hydrologic scenarios for the next generation of climate impacts assessments. This effort will carefully assess underlying model uncertainty and provide the water resources community with a manageable subset of quantitative hydrologic storylines to support water resources planning efforts.

Project Team

NCAR: Martyn Clark (PI), Grey Nearing, Andy Newman, Naoki Mizukami, Nans Addor, Andy Wood, Ethan Gutmann

University of Washington: Bart Nijssen, Jessica Lundquist, Michael Ou

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Jeff Arnold

Bureau of Reclamation: Levi Brekke

Contact: Martyn Clark - mclark@ucar.edu | Julie Vano – jvano@ucar.edu

Project Sponsors

National Science Foundation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation

More Information


Model information:



        2-Pager (same info as this page)


    Clark, M.P., B. Schaefli, S. Schymanski, L. Samaniego, C. Luce, B. Jackson, J. Freer, J.R. Arnold, D. Moore, E. Istanbulluoglu, and S. Ceola, 2016: Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 52, doi:10.1002/2015WR017910
    Clark, M.P., B. Nijssen, J.D. Lundquist, D. Kavetski, D.E. Rupp, R.A. Woods, J.E. Freer, E.D. Gutmann, A.W. Wood, D.J. Gochis, R.M. Rasmussen, D.G. Tarboton, V. Mahat, G.N. Flerchinger, and D.G. Marks, 2015: A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies. Water Resources Research, 51, 2515-2542, doi:10.1002/2015wr017200
    Clark, M.P., B. Nijssen, J.D. Lundquist, D. Kavetski, D.E. Rupp, R.A. Woods, J.E. Freer, E.D. Gutmann, A.W. Wood, L.D. Brekke, J.R. Arnold, D.J. Gochis, and R.M. Rasmussen, 2015: A unified approach to process-based hydrologic modeling. Part 1: Modeling concept. Water Resources Research, 51, 2498–2514, doi:10.1002/2015WR017198
    Newman,A.J., M.P. Clark, A. Winstral, D. Marks, and M. Seyfried, 2014: The use of similarity concepts to represent sub-grid varibility in hydrologic an land-surface models: Case study in a snowmelt dominated watershed. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, 1717-1738, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-038.1

Related Work



Sub-seasonal to Seasonal

Hydrologic Modeling

Streamflow Forecasting

Hydrologic storylines for evaluating climate impacts

Intermediate-Complexity Downscaling

Ensemble Meteorological Datasets

Streamflow Routing



3450 Mitchell Ln
Boulder, Colorado 80301
United States